I read an
article recently that rather unkindly referred to middle managers as the
“muddle in the middle”. This got me thinking about how often middle managers
get a bad press. I wonder if the “squeezed middle” might be a more appropriate description.
So, I write in defence of the middle
manager.
They are
required to communicate the organisational vision, frequently when this vision
is not being clearly communicated from the top leadership.
The have to
motivate tired employees, threatened by job insecurity from yet another
organisational change, and this is no easy matter.
Securing
cross-functional collaboration when resources are more and more constrained is
a challenge they face on a daily basis.
But that’s
not all they face! At times middle managers are also in the firing line from
their staff. They are a readily available target when someone from “management”
is needed to take the blame. Yet many employees are unaware of how frequently
their managers shield them from poor leadership.
Middle
managers are bridging the gap between executive managers and front-line
managers, and at a time when they need to be developing and up-skilling they
are not getting enough organisational attention.
Behavioural
capabilities such as fostering co-operation, securing employee engagement and
ensuring best practice are core aspects of a middle management role. They are
also key requirements for organisations facing volatility, trying to negotiate
change and seeking to encourage innovation.
The link
between organisational capability and business performance has been made many
times, there is no need for me to repeat it here. Developing the behavioural
capability and empowering middle managers, who are able to respond and adapt to
changing environments, will increase such organisational capability.
Yet learning
and development opportunities have been curtailed in many organisations as part
of cost cutting measures. So, let’s support
the middle managers, recognise their contribution to the bottom line, and
invest in their development.
No comments:
Post a Comment